A Time to Dance
2 Samuel 6:1-5, 12b-19; Mark 6:14-29

July 12, 2009


Something I share with the current Premier of our province is that we were both nurtured in a “strait-laced” religious tradition.  A feature of this type of faith is that it comes with a list of “forbidden activities.”  Included in both of our lists was the sin of dancing.  How it was explained to me was that the concern was not dancing per se, but “what it might lead to.”  Brad Wall, in his stand-up comedy avocation has a joke in his repertoire of how one thing leading to another, but I won’t steal his lines!

I never thought that those puritans, in their opposition to dancing, really made a convincing case.  But they missed a splendid opportunity by overlooking the texts that are before us today.  Here is Scriptural evidence that dancing is dangerous.  It can lead to marital breakdown in one instance, or to an early death in another!

 

THE REPATRIATION OF THE ARK

David’s political genius is seen in how he went about uniting the Northern and Southern tribes of Israel. He set up his capital in Jerusalem, which was neutral territory (stolen from the Jebusites, the  “Aboriginals” of the time).  He established it to be a religious as well as a political centre by bringing into it an historic symbol of their faith.   This National Treasure was the Ark of the Covenant.  This Holy Object dated to Moses’ time.  It’s construction had been commissioned by Moses (specifications can be found in Exodus) It contained the Tablets of the Laws (the second edition, as Moses had smashed the first in a fit of temper against his rebellious people).  When on the road the Ark was carried by several select priests holding it by poles inserted through rings.  The Ark preceded the people when they crossed the Jordan.  It went before their army in its march around Jericho, and was in front when their armies went into battle.

The Ark had awesome properties.  In Samuel’s time it fell into the hands of the Philistines.  While it was in the Philistine camp people broke out in tumours and there was an  invasion of rats. One suspects it might have been Bubonic plague!  Those who ventured to look inside the Ark dropped dead.  The Philistines decided they didn’t want it, and had it transported back to Hebrew territory.

 

For the next twenty years it was housed in a private shrine about ten miles West of Jerusa­lem.. It was virtually forgotten until David brought it home.  There is no mention of the Ark in the Hebrew Scriptures after the monarchy.  There is considerable speculation as to what may have become of it.  There is one theory that it has been sequestered in a Coptic Church in Ethiopia.  Another researcher claims to have found it in a museum in Zimbabwe.  But if you have seen the Indiana Jones movie you know it is safely hidden away in a warehouse in Washington DC.

David’s bringing the Ark to Jerusalem is comparable of the Stone of Scone being repatriated to Scotland.  He had some second thoughts when one of the bearers, Uzzah, reached out to steady it, and fell down dead.  But David persevered with his plan and with the triumphal entry of the Ark into his city there is joyful celebration.  David leads the parade, leaping and dancing, clad in his kilt.  His garment is described as a linen ephod (possibly a loincloth).

 

David’s wife, Michal, watches from her window and is scandalized and horrified by the sight of the King’s unkingly behaviour.  When David returns home she is quick to expresses her dis­pleasure vitriolically and sarcastically.  She lets him have it “with both barrels.”

Did Michal have a case?  In her view it was simply not proper protocol for a King to behave in such a way.  No way would her father Saul have joined with the rabble and behave like them!

 

Whether she was right or wrong in confronting the King for his poor behaviour, it was very poor judgment on her part.  This was ancient Israel, millennia before the existence of women’s lib, or any Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Women were property to be sold by fathers and bought by husbands.  And this husband was an absolute monarch.  Confrontation was not the way to go about reforming him.  Unfortunately for Michal she was not as shrewd as a future wife, Bathsheba, who knew how to work the system and how to push the right buttons to get what she wanted.

And so here is how the story ends for Michal:

 

And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child to the day of her death.

 (2 Samuel 6:23)

 

                             ENCOUNTER OF JOHN THE BAPTIST AND KING HEROD  

In today’s Gospel we read about another denunciation of a King’s behaviour.  John the Baptist was a popular fiery preacher.  He drew a crowd wherever he went--even in the desert.  His message was “REPENT!”  And his message was the same to the high and the low.  If you sinned and had broken the Law there is no hope unless you repent.  The Day of Judgment is at hand.

 

Not even the King was exempt. His marriage to Herodias, a former wife of his brother, was a violation of God’s Law.  This previous marriage would not be an impediment in either Roman or Canadian Law, but the union was prohibited in the Leviticus Holiness Code.

King Herod was not a Monarch like David had been.  He was a puppet of Rome in charge of a minor territory that included Galilee.  As long as he did what the Romans wanted and as long as he kept forwarding the taxes to Rome, he could enjoy all the trappings of royalty.  He could wear royal robes and entertain VIPs and throw lavish parties.

 

Herod had put John in prison, as much for own protection than for any charge against him.  John had made many enemies who wanted him dead, not the least of whom was Herodias. Herod enjoyed visiting with John in jail.  John was no yes-man.  In no way was his counsel tempered by what Herod might be wanting to hear.

 

But this arrangement was not what Herodias wanted as the solution to the “John the Baptist problem.” 150 years in jail was not the answer she wanted!

The opportunity came for Herodias when Herod put on a birthday party for himself and invited all the rich and famous and powerful people in the realm.  The highlight of the evening was his stepdaughter’s dance. We learn from the Jewish historian, Josephus, that her name is Salome, and we learn from Richard Strauss that the dance involved Seven Veils.  In any event Salome’s performance was a hit. Herod is so pleased that he offers her anything she wishes, even “half of his kingdom.”

Most would know that such an offer is not to be taken literally.  Should any of you men take a trip to the Holy Land, and a street trader offers 100 camels and 200 sheep for your wife, you know that it’s not expected that you accept the offer.  Likely he doesn’t own that amount of livestock anyway, and it would be a considerable loss of face for you to take him up on it!  Esther had been made the same offer by King Xerxes and her response was to invite the King to dinner.

 

Herod likely had in mind something like shoes and a handbag.  Salome had to check with Mommy who instructed her what to ask for.

 

Herod was no “David.”  No one would catch him dancing in an ephod.  For Herod it mattered very much what people thought.  “Saving face” was everything. So he caved in.  Herodias got what she wanted.

 

The tragedy of John the Baptist is a fascinating story, but why does Mark include it his gospel, and in particular, why does he put it where he does?  The martyrdom of John is told as a “flashback” which is inserted between Jesus’ sending out his disciples on a mission, and their reporting back. Their mission was to proclaim that “ALL SHOULD REPENT.”  This had been John’s message, and Jesus’ disciples knew what had happened to him!  The scene of John’s disciples going to retrieve his body and preparing it for burial was fresh in their minds.  So we can be sure that Jesus’ disciples went forth on their mission with considerable anxiety, but they went forth, nevertheless!

 

In the United Church of Canada we affirm in our Creed that we are a people who seek justice and resist evil.  If that is so, then we too are committed to a message of repentance.  In the calling to speak truth to power faithfulness comes with a price tag of possible rejection, misunderstand­ing, and putting our heads on the line.

 

Those disciples returned from their mission bringing reports of healing and casting out demons.  They were thrilled to be sharing in Jesus’ work of ministry.

 

And so, these stories of confronting power with truth leave us with the question, “Is the reward of sharing in God’s work of reconciliation worth the risks?”

Preached by Howard Hanson
Knox-Metropolitan United Church
Regina, Saskatchewan